Fiely iNfo

If you wanted to get rich, how would you do it? I think your best bet would be to start or join a startup. That's been a reliable way to get rich for hundreds of years. The word "startup" dates from the 1960s, but what happens in one is very similar to the venture-backed trading voyages of the Middle Ages. Startups usually involve technology, so much so that the phrase "high-tech startup" is almost redundant. A startup is a small company that takes on a hard technical problem. Lots of people get rich knowing nothing more than that. You don't have to know physics to be a good pitcher. But I think it could give you an edge to understand the underlying principles. Why do startups have to be small? Will a startup inevitably stop being a startup as it grows larger? And why do they so often work on developing new technology? Why are there so many startups selling new drugs or computer software, and none selling corn oil or laundry detergent? The Proposition Econom...

SFF BASIC CONVERSATION SUMMARY Your browser does not support the audio element.

By the time Leila Hormozi was 29 years old, she had already sold her first business for $50 million, an outcome that for most people would mark the peak of a lifetime career. By the age of 30, her portfolio of companies crossed $200 million per year in revenue, spanning brick-and-mortar services, licensing, education, e-commerce, and multiple other business models. These figures are not just impressive; they are disorienting. They carry the kind of finality that suggests the game has been solved, that the story has reached its resolution. And yet, when Leila speaks about that period of her life, there is no sense of arrival—only the beginning of a more difficult, more honest reckoning with what success actually does and does not provide. It’s easy to assume that achievements of that magnitude automatically translate into happiness, fulfillment, or peace. Society conditions us to believe that scale equals satisfaction, that once the numbers are big enough, ...

It was 6:14 a.m., and my phone had already blinked with 27 notifications. Alarm snoozed, I checked Slack before I even opened my eyes. I wasn’t tired — I was accustomed to exhaustion. But that morning, something felt different. My heart was beating too fast, and I had to remind my body to breathe. I wasn’t “busy.” I was overloaded. That was the moment I realized something crucial: productivity wasn’t a tool anymore — it was a burden. Every to-do list I made felt like a cage. Every productivity hack promised “more output” but delivered more pressure. The vague whisper in my mind went from “Finish this” to “Do more. Always more.” I was performing productivity like it was a sport — and I wasn’t winning. I was just tired. Sound familiar? Most of us treat productivity like it’s a magic bullet. Get better systems. Track tasks. Outsource this. Automate that. We even congratulate each other when we sacrifice sleep or skip meals to get “important work done.” But what if all that work wasn’t act...

The Small Decisions That Quietly Decide Everything Most people think change announces itself. A breaking point. A public declaration. A dramatic before-and-after story they can point to and say, that’s when it happened . That’s rarely how it works. Real change arrives quietly. It slips in through repetition, through habits so small they barely register as effort . No one claps for them. No one notices them at first. But they accumulate. And one day you look around and realize your finances are steadier, your thinking is clearer, your confidence feels less borrowed, and your life is no longer run by panic or noise. I didn’t learn this from an extreme routine or a radical overhaul. I learned it from paying attention to what actually moved the needle when everything else failed. Micro-habits did. Not the kind that look impressive on social media. The kind that feel almost too ordinary to matter. Until they do. This is not advice shouted from a distance. This is written at eye level, for ...